Sunday, 30th May 2010
Ħondoq project
Can't afford to make mistakes - de Marco
The authorities cannot afford to make any mistakes over a proposal to develop the "pristine" bay at Ħondoq ir-Rummien in Gozo, Tourism Parliamentary Secretary Mario de Marco said yesterday.
Contacted in the wake of last Thursday's rowdy public hearing on the proposed controversial marina village in Qala, Dr de Marco said it was too simplistic to talk about the advantages of a yacht marina at Ħondoq without also looking at the impact this may have on the bay.
"Our environment is too small to afford to suffer any more mistakes than we have already committed in the past, sometimes even in the name of tourism and progress," he told The Sunday Times.
"One has to examine such proposed projects with great caution, especially if we want to promote 'responsible tourism' for our future," he said.
Dr de Marco, whose remit includes the environment and the planning authority, said that ultimately it was a matter of weighing the advantages a marina may have against the impact on the environment of the specific locality where it was proposed, on marine life and the adjacent bay.
"That is what sustainable development requires. That is what responsible tourism demands," he said.
The project - comprising a five-star hotel, 285 residential units and villas, 731 underground parking spaces, 10 shops, five restaurants and a marina for some 150 boats - has been dogged by controversy since Gozo Prestige Holidays filed an application in 2002.
The €120 million development on a disused quarry owned by Victor Bajada was inspired by the "hanging garden effect" of villages dotting the Amalfi Coast in Italy, but environmental NGOs and residents were not impressed.
In 2002, Qala council held a referendum in which 85 per cent of residents voted to keep Ħondoq ir-Rummien bay free of development. They remain strongly opposed to the project as witnessed during the heated hearing organised by the Malta Environment and Planning Authority last week.
During that meeting, mayor Paul Buttigieg said the majority of residents would continue to oppose the development as long as the yacht marina, which they believed threatened the bay's integrity, remained part of the plans.
However, Edward Bencini, the architect entrusted with drafting the project, feels the marina is a crucial element.
"You can buy a Rolls Royce or a Mini Minor. A marina is the quality project Gozo deserves. Everybody raised hell about the Hilton marina in St Julian's years ago. Today everyone realises the marina is the project - it gives it essence," he said when contacted.
Eight years on, despite ongoing opposition, the developers still believe in the project and Mr Bencini insists the presence of a marina village in Gozo "will give it the missing jewel in its crown".
"We believe Gozo deserves a project of this nature. We have a vision for it. Just because of a few people who have their private interests at heart and believe the Qala beach is theirs and theirs alone... does not mean that a necessary and quality project such as this should not see the light of day," he said.
"This is all a matter of proper management. This was done in Italy, France and Greece, why not in Malta?" Mr Bencini said.
Environment NGOs and Alternattiva Demokratika yesterday reiterated their opposition to the marina village.
Flimkien għal Ambjent Aħjar and the Ramblers' Association issued a joint statement maintaining that this project was designed to serve the private interests of a few and "ride roughshod" over the wishes and well-being of the people.
The statement also deplored Mepa's handling of the public consultation, a sentiment echoed by the Save Ħondoq Movement.
Alternattiva Demokratika spokesman for sustainable development Carmel Cacopardo said the rowdy meeting made it clear the proposed development was still based on speculators taking over land used for leisure and restricting the public right to access the beach.
Comments
What about the people Dr De Marco?? your people.... the equation is still to simplistic until you add your public!! it's not just about environment vs developers vs tourism.
Time and again, it's the people, ironically the overwhelming majority, of the country that get considered last, if at all.
Our precious developer empire is left to lay siege on our islands and time we have no knights to protect us.
Or do we, Dr de Marco?
These so-called developers have obtained land at dirt-cheap ODZ prices and want to build a residential complex on this ODZ land. Let them build on land scheduled for development if they want to build.
On this proposed rape of Hondoq ir-Rummien, Alternattiva Demokratika have clearly laid out their position. What about the two major political parties? Can we get a clear and official statement from them, rather than just saying that it is being featured in their media? Their continued silence can be interpreted in a number of ways.
Well said John Montague!
I all boils down to sound planning, where Malta sadly fails time and time again as we are so reluctant to go for long-term plans, and by long-term I mean longer than the next election.
FAA has always pressed for holistic planning as exemplified by Strategic Environmental Assessments (SEAs). The refusal to carry out SEAs in the 2006 Rationalisation Plans is a tragic loss for this country as with every passing week developers are applying for permits to build more large tracts of our countryside into estates of 50 - 500 housing units. And this in a country that already has over 75,000 empty housing units.
Incidentally the Hondoq project is not just touristic but includes a large component of real estate.
It is very heartening to read Dr. de Marco's enlightened words "Our environment is too small to afford to suffer any more mistakes than we have already committed in the past, sometimes even in the name of tourism and progress"
As to the development being dubbed 'the missing jewel in the crown" by Mr Bencini: it was the German novelist and poet, GOETHE, who called PRAGUE the prettiest gem in the stone crown of the world - for its beautiful 18th century architecture which can still be admired to this day. Ruining the natural beauty of Gozo can hardly be described in such sublime terms.
Why don't we start thinking outside the box, for a change, and build marinas and fancy hotels on RECLAIMED land in areas that have ALREADY been ruined by overdevelopment, thanks to MEPA?
Fish gotta swim and bird gotta fly,
Man gotta build right up to the sky...Can't help blaming the MEPA guy.
Some say that he's crazy, some say that he's slow,
Some say that he's lazy, boy, DO I know...Can't help...
(apologies to O. Hammerstein and J.Kern)
Mr. Bencini, the jewel is already there. You just don't see it.
To the maltese people...lets stop this farce that we call maltese politics once and for all. Where we are made to believe one party is against the other while both enjoy the benefits behind the scenes. So fed up of this NONSENSE. Lets stop my party and your party talk and lets defend MALTA from the people WE have elected...We have a moral obligation towards ourselves and our children. We NEED to stop fighting each other and realize the problems are elsewhere. Let us mature a bit more if need be. We cannot continue to show our protest and then perpetuate our vote (which ever party we are with). We Need to make sure that our politicians work for us, for MALTA. But when you are faced by developers bringing in millions then i start to worry. Cos then Who is daddy MR politician? eh?
Or you can take a stroll and it's not only free, but healthy too.
Re Hilton, 'everyone' raised hell since it was stolen from people and the permit issue was slightly shady. Personally, I fail to see the big deal about the Hilton project today either. Of course, unlike you I can't speak for everyone.
The issue is, as I see it, not one of the ignorance of the "foreigner bashers". The issue is to stop this constant wanton destruction of the natural beauty of the place. You can't do that if you run away.
Rather let's fight against these rapists for the good of the island and the Gozitans, most of whom are wonderful, caring people.
I do Know how you feel though, I have felt that way many times in the past.
People were rude because they are afraid that they will lose money- and for them money is above everything else.
They do not dislike you because you are a “foreigner”, they dislike you because you do not simply roll over and let them walk all over you.
If it is of any consolation, they hate even “fellow” Maltese and Gozitans who oppose them.
For the vast majority of us, people who have invested here and made Malta/Gozo their home are not “foreigners” – you have just as much right as anyone else to make your opinion heard, and respected.
But 85% Of the pupuation of malta and gozo, stop these ruins and rape of this true jewel in the mediteranean, I am glad that at least we have a strong tourism minister that opposes this project He really have the maltese and gozo people at heart And he is not afraid to condem any wrong doing Well done Dr Mario De Marco.
please Keep It Up And defend our jewel of an island.
In fighting his corner architect Bencini attempts to mislead or else is oblivious to the overwhelming numerical strength of environmental opponents and beach users (Maltese, Gozitans and foreigners) when he dismisses the source of honest and valid objections with "just because of a few people who have their private interests at heart and believe that the Qala beach is theirs and theirs alone".
Perhaps Dr. de Marco's words offer a ray of hope to those with a conscience who want to preserve the few remaining places of natural beauty within these islands by opposing the rape of Hondoq ir-Rummien. The outcome rests squarely at the door of governing politicians - will they be praised for patriotic vision or condemned for short-sighted appeasement of the well-connected but greedy few. No mistakes please!
Those that attended the hearing on Thursday could see in the foyer, plans made by university students of how Hondoq should be as a park for EVERYONE.
Anyone with a bit of common sense (and doesn't have personal interest) could see that Hondoq should be left natural, Gozo has enough empty buildings, one good example is chambray. Thousands of jobs were promised, but never came to materialize.
This project should have been stopped eight years ago, when 85% of Qala said NO and are still saying NO!!
This is the link to the times article of what the students proposed http://www.timesofmalta.com/articles/view/20091019/local/hondoq-through-the-eyes-of-students
The Hilton Marina was developed in an already disturbed area and there was nothing pristine about it and part of and existing urban foot print. This would be like any development taking place in a degenerated (as Paceveille was at that time) built up areas. Any projects within the present urban footprint would be welcome if planned well and respects peoples quality of life and enhance the living environment, Building a whole new project in a pristine area which is so RARE in Malta due to its Open space and built up areas proportionality is TOTALLY unacceptable. Where is this going to stop? Every year more and more Projects proposed in these areas which should be cherished with great love by all Maltese and Tourists. Preserve what’s left of the Maltese Islands open spaces and rehabilitate areas which are ALREADY gone under the excavaton machines. Does anyone really believe that these Islands need more development on 'Virgin' land? And more of the same when most are not operating to full capacity!!!!
Can I ask Dr de Marco a very simple question please? In what way do you believe that this massive tourist complex is going to succeed when so many Gozo hotels have closed in the recent past due to under use?
I'm a tourist, one of those people Dr de Marco claims to speak for, and I'm beginning to wonder why I keep coming back to Gozo. I wouldn't holiday in Malta if I was paid to due to over development and these environmental rapists are doing the same thing to Gozo.
Residents of Qala let us protect our lovely clean water beach , we welcome everybody to enjoy a day out with their family by this lovely waters.
Developers where do you want us to take our children for a day out ? May be you suggest Marsalforn, Xlende, Ramla Bay , or Dwara !!!!! Let me remand you that all the Beaches are contaminated and soon Ramla Bay will be the same like all the others with that New Nadur Cemetery , in the coming future this Beach will be contaminated too. .
.
I asked Tourism Parliamentary Secretary Dr Mario De Marco several questions about eco-tourism in Gozo, including questions about the government's position and justification of a golf course and airport in Gozo.
At least some of my questions were sent to high officials at MTA (someone in MTA told me this), who prepared my answers - but then, after waiting many weeks and sending email reminders that I was still waiting, I still hadn't received the answers. I don't understand why at least some of the answers were prepared and yet still not passed on to me in the end.
The article was published in Destinations of the World News (www.dotwnews.com) a Dubai-based international tourism-trade magazine that is read by 30,000 international movers and shakers in the tourism industry, and also distributed in many airports around the world.
You can read the article here: http://www.victorborg.com/html/gozo-green-tourism.html
Victor Borg
www.victorborg.com
i agree with the Qala people who disagree with the yacht marina because of 2 reasons.
they will not afford to use the marina and it affects the marine life negatively because of the pollution from diesel, petrol, and raw sewage like what i see from time to time near where i am fishing in my boat. as we progress more we attract less and less tourists. who are these wise people who are saying that this developement will attract more tourists?
and why should we give our beaches to the elite whether they are local people or tourists. people should continue to object to this 'pollution' because we have enough of it. Dr Demarco, if you care for Gozo, please do not let such big projects go ahead. thank you. concerned for our environment peace
Even your metaphors are sickening.
Of course it's a crucial element. For the contamination of the last bay in Gozo which has yet to fall for the vandalization of the speculators and environment vandalizers. What about the contamination of the bay by the yachts Edward? Or do you have a swimming pool and do not care a hoot about the rest of the population?
Can the authorities not realize that we do not ha a coast of thousands of miles and too many bays have been contaminated by yacht marinas so that the rich can park their yachts while the rest of the people cannot even go for a swim? Do the people have to carry out a revolution to get their bays back? Do the people have to carry out a revolution to get what is theirs and was taken from them for the rich to enjoy? Rise up people. That seems to be the only way to get your rights against the oppressors.
The owners of the qala project complain for the lack of business due to Gozo Tourism neglect. While they castigate the government for not making enough effort to attract tourists to the now, 'Gozo' concrete jungle, they apply to MEPA for the tourism oriented project to be turned into a residential village. They are ready to sacrifice their investment in exchange for public funds to turn this village to social housing.
There is something wrong with my crystal ball as suddenly it takes me back to Mgarr Hotel and Jerma Palace, being demolished because in 2008 there was over capacity of hotel beds.
Maybe architect Bencini could lend me his crystal ball, my is surley blurring the future... or is it??
Hands off public spaces. If you have a project; seek private land and pay market price for it, otherwise go to Amalfi or Greece or Spain and build it there. Leave some breathing space for our children
Positive: You have a lot of heritage and history, the old buses are nice, customer care and food in hotel was quite satisfactory. The trip to Gozo and/or Comino was really nice and we really enjoyed it there cause its different!
Negative: Too much Buildings,Prices are quite expensive, Too much crazy traffic and drivers ( not only bus drivers) very few sandy beaches.
I personally am not in favour or against this proposed project cause I didn't scrutinized it and so I don't know what effects across the board will have but what can I say from the feedback I get from the foreigners I meet is that they like Gozo because is a different place to visit so this says it all!
Why didn’t Architect Bencini fight for the preservation of the Mgarr hotel, wasn’t this hotel a 5 star overlooking the Mgarr marina? Wasn’t this suitable for Gozo?
I ask Architect Bencini why the Mgarr hotel was not sustainable but the Hondoq project is?
Comparing Gozo’s small beaches to the vastness of the Amalfi Coast is like comparing Apples & Oranges.
@Just because of a few people who have their private interests at heart and believe the Qala beach is theirs and theirs alone...
How dare Architect Bencini to say such words. First it’s not a few people who want to protect Hondoq, just refer to the Qala referendum, to the number of persons who voiced their opposition during the MEPA meeting and to the number of persons writing on various newspapers against this monstrous project.
Second, those that want to protect this bay against this project, are unlikely to protect it for their “private interest”. As far as I know, no one is occupying this beach, everyone is welcomed to this beach be it locals or foreigners, and no one is fouling the water!
1. It is their project.
2. They will become a millionaire form just one project.
The Islands' sizes allow us Maltese an incredible advantage over larger ones in term of resilience an an ability to adapt. Such a master approach, not solely contained to tourism, would augur well for us. The energy wasted in all of this, including this letter, would be better spent in better planning. Even MEPA would become quasi-redundant.
This is an incredible statement coming from none other than the architect entrusted with the drafting of the project!
"the presence of a marina village in Gozo "will give it the missing jewel in its crown".
Sure, it will undoubtedly improve on the natural beauty of the place! to be enjoyed by the elite few.
"This is all a matter of proper management. This was done in Italy, France and Greece, why not in Malta?" Mr Bencini said.
Gozo can fit easily in most cities found in these countries. If these are the arguments these people can come up with to justify their actions then their case should lose out.
A final plea to Dr De marco who appears to realise that the proposed project will ruin the area.
Please put some pressure in the cabinet in favour of Malta and Gozo. The people will be grateful when the time comes for the reckoning.
The only "jewel in the crown" I'm seeing with the realization of this project is found in the architect (who else?) and the developers' bank account.
CHARLIE MIZZI
No comments:
Post a Comment